You might say I was a little prejudice about the movies even before I saw it. If a movie is good rarely you see its cast and crew running around in circles going here and there. People will not go on yapping about the movie if it’s a master piece. So I was really circumspect about the movie. 30mins into the movie I felt completely justified.
If many people tell you that a movie is good, then it has to be good! If you say its not then you are not normal. I get the feeling this might be one of the reasons for the popularity of the movie or they might have paid the critics off. The western audience can be excused. They might have been under the impression that this was an “ethnic Indian” movie and we all know what purchasing power those two words have.
The problem I have with the movie is that for a realistic movie it chooses to be realistic when it pleases. I do not have any problem with the showing of the slums and slum life and the various atrocities surrounding it. If we want to be a developed country we need to address these issues. It could well be an eye opener for many. The thing that moved me the most was the love story in the movie. The lead character was in love with a girl who was literally raped by his brother and who was a full time prostitute, kind of put things in perspective for me.
I couldn’t understand what’s so great about the movie. The story isn’t that great. I do agree that
I have never understood why we Indians feel that if anything is remotely associated with
4 comments:
SDM should be appreciated for what it is: a good movie to watch. The treatment of the subject (which, btw, is the age old story of 'true love can never fail' crap!) was different from the usual romances.
I never for once felt neither that it was an 'Indian' movie nor that it was a movie about India. It was just a movie about the love of two slum dwellers and how they manage to unite despite the odds being up against them.
It could have happened in any big city of the world, and the director saw it fit to narrate the story in an Indian background, maybe because the original story had an Indian background.
And, the movie had some MINDBLOWING music for sure!
you should send this to the hindu, I am tired of reading how great the movie is.
u r right..as for the music THEY probably havent heard AR rahmans roja or Bombay
its very unrealsitic...for one thing the show is live??.it doesnt say anything about the numerous rounds he has to go thru before he gets to the hotseat.apart from that yea the whole latika thing was wierd too...well i can spot 10 better completely indian movies tht has gone so unnoticed..
totally agree wid u man...
reeling under the hype surrounding the movie when I saw it, I was not impressed.. Its a cool movie, but nothing out of the box. And Rahman has definitely churned out better stuff... But well as as Indian I'm proud that an Indian is nominated for the oscar, the movie however is definitely not Indian, its just a movie about India.
And the 'real America' , 'real Indian' thing did really piss me of.. I'm glad someone noticed it. Real Indians are thieves and Real Americans Angels?? Now seriosly gimme a break!
Post a Comment