There is an editor

The "cash for vote" scandal was caught on tape with the help of the TV news channel "CNN-IBN". Even though when the MP's flashed currency notes in the Parliament, the channel refrained from showing the sting operation on television, instead handed over the full evidence to the Speaker. The channel later gave a press statement saying that the reason for not showing the footage was that, there were loops holes in the video, the evidence they had on tape was not concrete enough to prove that MP's were offered money. They also said that they did not want to sensationalize the issue which was, to their assessment not 100% credible, at such a critical juncture.

The way the channel handled the entire issue was commendable. The respect I have for the channel has increased because of this decision. At a time when news channels do not even think for one second before airing a report, trying to over hype/sensationalize issues without even getting the entire facts right just to have a slight edge over other rival channels, without thinking of the consequences of their action, CNN-IBN truly stands out. If they had aired the footage, the whole nation would have been watching their channel and the audience for other news channels would be next to nil. The brave decision took by the channel shows that ethics in journalism is not something of the past. It shows that there are still editors who think about the larger picture instead of short term gains.

If they had aired the footage people would have got influenced for sure. Even if the scam was later on found to be a scam, the reputation of the ruling parties would have had irreparable damages. I do not think any other news channel would have taken such a bold decision. At times when news channels enact stories about which it has no information about, god only knows what they would have done if they had got a story with little information in hand.

All news channels should take a cue from the actions of CNN-IBN, especially the Hindi news channels and channels like Headlines Today and Times Now. Journalist should understand the consequence of their actions. They should understand that any report aired will impact the entire nation. Far too often we have seen the above mentioned news channels air reports and few days down the line we find them to be misleading or false. I do believe that these news channels when they air such reports, they just want to make a name for themselves and do not have any other bad intention in mind. It's high time they started to act more responsibly. They should understand that what ever they say the nation will believe. The job of any news channel is to bring the truth to light and I believe all news channels are working on that principle. If there is the slightest of chance that a story can be false or misleading I believe that news channels should pull it off keeping in mind the larger interest of the nation/humanity. If news channels do not start to self regulate themselves in a more organized way they government would be forced to step in, which is not something any one wants

Irresponsible politics

Recently Sushma Swaraj of the BJP said that the terrorist attacks that happened were part of a conspiracy of the congress to shift the attention of the people from the "cash for vote" scandal. That was an absolutely irresponsible and uncalled for statement from a relatively senior politician. That was a kind of statement that could create communal violence.

Well I am not going to question the validity of her accusation. It may or may not be right, but come on, give me a break. I don’t think any political party in India would put the citizens of the country at harms way for such an insignificant matter. With only a few months left for the parliament to conclude the chances of that scam to be solved/settled were very less. The reason why I felt that the comment was so outrageous was that, the logic behind that was so stupid and ridiculous. If she had said that the congress is behind the attacks because it wants to undermine the BJP lead state governments so that it can win the upcoming elections, it would have looked a bit more viable.

I am pretty sure that she didn’t mean to start any communal riots with the statement of hers. It was just plane old dirty politics to get more votes. People from the BJP have been making similar volatile comments in the past and party had faced a lot of criticism and embarrassment. I remember either Venkayya Naidu or Arun Jaitley saying in a press conference that the population of Muslims have increased a lot and the Hindu population has not increased correspondingly and hence Hindus should try to increase there population so that normalcy can be maintained. Similar outrageous statements were made by L K Advani on the Babri Masjid, and how can one forget Narendra Modi. The one positive that I found among these people were, even though they had done crimes for which they can never be forgiven, they have learned from their mistakes and have refrained from making statements that could lead to riots.(not included Sushma Swaraj). Even if Muslims still face a hard time in Gujrat, Modi is doing all that he can to clear his name and ensure that he is taking a comparatively more secular stand.

The antics of the BJP is nothing compared that to what Raj Thackery and the Shiva Sena do in Maharashtra. They have this obsession with the word "Mumbai" and everything Marata. They take up insignificant issues such as valentines day or westernization of the state and act as its moral police. Right now Raj Thackery is over shadowing the Shiva Sena in terms of violence caused. His aim is simple, to get more and more marata votes and for that he will use any means necessary, including violating the basic human rights and the Indian constitution. To a certain extend I can understand his point about Mumbai getting overcrowded with non Maratis, but Mumbai is what it is now because of such a culture. Not quite sure why he doesn’t have much of a problem with outsiders occupying other parts of Maharastra. Him being adamant over the word "Mumbai", ordering all films not to use the word "Bombay" and asking Bombay dieing to change its name to Mumbai dieing is quite outrageous and unconstitutional. The kind of hate he is spreading misguides his supporters. Even though i agree that the "marata" cause is important, to cause violence in that name is not acceptable. Raj Thackery is trying to eat into the Shiva Sena vote bank and for that he is creating all this havoc.

Getting voters on its side is what all political parties should do, but to adopt any means to do so is not right. Just like business ethics is given a lot of importance these days, lot of emphasis should be given to political ethics. I believe that the Indian voter get more mature and reject all unethical, immoral ways political parties use to come into power. Its quite sad that in the land of the Mahatma people find that only violence is the answer to any problem.