When i was in school my history teacher was telling about the wars India had with Pakistan and the blunder which he thought Nehru had committed when he didn't capture Islamabad. At that time and even till few months back i did believe that what Nehru did was stupid. Recently I had a change of heart. If Nehru had captured Islamabad then India would have been bombarded with unprecedented acts of terrors. I am not talking about the Pakistani army getting resurrected and fighting wars against India, I am talking about rouge elements in Pakistan trying to get revenge by various acts of terror on civilians. Even though at this point of time India is facing lots of acts of terror, this would be nothing compared to what would have happened if we had captured Pakistan. Right now only a small minority in Pakistan have hatred towards India. The situation would have been much different hadn't Nehru done what he had done. There would have been a huge anti India sentiment and it would have been extremely easy for the extremist and the fundamentalist to exploit this feeling and plot against India. War by rouge elements in a country is much dangerous than a war by military forces. In a military war civilians are generally not targeted where as terrorist would not refrain from doing anything. Hence I believe what Nehru did was in the interest of the country.
Now the bigger issue," the war on terror". I got this point of view from a RC passage in some AIMCAT. Even if the US destroys Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan and various other countries, they(or the world community) would never win the war on terror. When there is a war and innocent people die, the hatred towards the nation causing all the damage would sky rocket. Hence even if all the terrorist camps are destroyed its just a matter of time before new ones crop up. As people would lose what ever they have and are left with nothing to live for, naturally their only aim would be to make the country who caused them all the pain pay big time.(there are lots of examples, on of the most damaging on is the military action that Russia conducted on Chechnya, and the innumerable instances of innocent civilians killed by Chechnian terrorist as their response to Russia's military action) A terrorist to cause damage does not have to destroy an entire nation, all he/she has to do is target key locations and any nation would bleed. Even if no acts of terror are conducted, the mass hysteria that terrorist creates is even more dangerous than the terror acts. People feeling unsafe, various propaganda being circulated, the panic and fear the stays in peoples mind are various examples.
The only way to win the war against terror is in the mind. Only if we change the mind set of people can the war against terror be won. When people are reformed the chances of them turning back is very less. The only thing which any war can achieve is an exponential increase in hatred. Governments should take steps towards changing the mind sets of people. They should ensure that people are not lured by the terrorists. The various conditions such as poverty, illiteracy, hunger, which are the main cause for people to turn into extremist should be addressed by governments. No community should feel left out or discriminated against. Only when such a state is attained we can win the war against terrorism. Simply bombing and destroying countries wont do the trick.
Now the bigger issue," the war on terror". I got this point of view from a RC passage in some AIMCAT. Even if the US destroys Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan and various other countries, they(or the world community) would never win the war on terror. When there is a war and innocent people die, the hatred towards the nation causing all the damage would sky rocket. Hence even if all the terrorist camps are destroyed its just a matter of time before new ones crop up. As people would lose what ever they have and are left with nothing to live for, naturally their only aim would be to make the country who caused them all the pain pay big time.(there are lots of examples, on of the most damaging on is the military action that Russia conducted on Chechnya, and the innumerable instances of innocent civilians killed by Chechnian terrorist as their response to Russia's military action) A terrorist to cause damage does not have to destroy an entire nation, all he/she has to do is target key locations and any nation would bleed. Even if no acts of terror are conducted, the mass hysteria that terrorist creates is even more dangerous than the terror acts. People feeling unsafe, various propaganda being circulated, the panic and fear the stays in peoples mind are various examples.
The only way to win the war against terror is in the mind. Only if we change the mind set of people can the war against terror be won. When people are reformed the chances of them turning back is very less. The only thing which any war can achieve is an exponential increase in hatred. Governments should take steps towards changing the mind sets of people. They should ensure that people are not lured by the terrorists. The various conditions such as poverty, illiteracy, hunger, which are the main cause for people to turn into extremist should be addressed by governments. No community should feel left out or discriminated against. Only when such a state is attained we can win the war against terrorism. Simply bombing and destroying countries wont do the trick.
No comments:
Post a Comment